From Stage to Page: Turning Messages into Manuscripts
James Watkins © 2007
Charles Spurgeon did it. John Wesley did it. Peter Marshall did it.
And
I suspect that, today,
Joyce
Meyer, Charles Stanley, Beth Moore and even
Max
Lucado
are
doing it.
And, since you’re in this
class, you probably want to do it, too.
Those speakers and pastors are taking
their sermons or teachings
and
turning them into books.
And, there’s probably not a pastor
or public speaker alive
who
hasn’t thought,
I’ll record my talk, transcribe it and
send it to a publisher
But the spoken word and the written
word are
two
very different animals
They’re
both forms of communication
but
that’s like saying
in
the cat family you have
Siamese
kittens and Saber Tooth tigers
they’re
both cats
but
very different
So, today, we’re going to look
at the differences between
speaking
and writing
look
at the similarities
and
provide some practical ways to go from
the
stage to the page . . .
Let’s take a look at the
differences
Draw
a line down the middle of your paper
On
the left write STAGE
and
on the right PAGE
Stage Page
On the stage,
you have a variety of items
in
your tool box
You
have your voice (which makes up 30 percent of our communication)
A
versatile tool that includes
tone
of voice
volume
melodic
quality
Not
talking about words, but the actual voice
Tim
Allen’s “Home Improvement” made grunting a sophisticated
form
of communication
Surprise
Fear
Pride
You
have your body language (which make up over 50 percent “)
Gestures
Facial
expressions
Did
your Mom or Dad have “the look”?
You’re
cutting up and church and they just have to give you the
“look”
And
you know you’ll be spending Sunday afternoon
in
your room
Body movements
[Arms
crossed]
[Arms
open]
You
have props
Local
in the local parish, I used lots of props in my messages
I
rode the down aisle on a bicycle with a white shirt and black
pants
and
gave a message as if I was a Mormon “missionary”
and
so pointing out the unbiblical religion
I
spoke from Philippians 3 about everything being trash
compared
to knowing Christ
so
would put something in a trash can to make point
T-itles
(ordination certificate)
R-ches
(my new guitar)
A-ccomplishments
(Campus Life award plaque)
S-holarship (transcript from grad school)
H-oliness
(legalism; a book I edited on holiness)
And
one Sunday, made waffles on the platform
as
I talked about political and spiritual “waffling”
Oh,
and you also have a words (which
makes up only 10 percent of our
daily
conversation)
But when you open your
writer’s tool box,
there’s
no voice
[surprise,
fear grunts]
no
body language
no
props
Nothing
but words!
You’ve
gone from the stage’s 100 percent effect
down
to 10 percent
Black
ink on white paper
Pixels
on a computer screen
That’s why simply transcribing
a sermon or teaching rarely works
You
just lost 90 percent of the effect!
On the stage, you’re in front of the audience; in writing,
you’re in front of a computer screen
You’re probably known as a speaker
If
you’re speaking in your church, Sunday school class
to
an organization that you’re a member
There’s a relationship there
You
know them, they know you
You
both know the appropriate behaviors for that setting
In
writing, you may not have a relationship with your readers
They’re
reading a magazine and come upon your article
They’re
surfing the Web and happen to click on your site
How
are you going to connect with your readers?
Here
are some ways to do that on the page:
Get
sample copies of the magazine
Read
the writer’s guide
At
the teen magazine I edited for six year,
we
had surveyed youth camps in our denomination
We
new exactly who our read was:
Jennifer is fifteen years old, a Christian, and attends church and youth
meetings faithfully. She doesn’t have a regular time alone with God and
rarely reads her Bible. Jennifer has a pretty good understanding of salvation,
but is unsure about the denomination’s emphases on “entire
sanctification.” A good friend has tried sex and drugs, but she
hasn’t. She has a crush on a guy at church, but he acts like she
doesn’t exist. She has no convictions against dating a non-Christian, but
is not sure where she stands about marrying a non-Christian.
So,
as I dug through the pile of unsolicited manuscripts on my desk,
I
was only interested in articles that would
effectively
communicate with Jennifer.
All
magazines have “writers guidelines” that provide detailed information on their readers.
On the stage, you’re known and trusted, on the page you may not be
Obviously they know you and trust
you as a speaker
or
they’d never let you near a lectern or pulpit
People
are going to believe what you say because you
have
a history with the audience
Hopefully,
in writing
the
magazine is an old friend
They’re
been subscribing to it for years
Or,
the reader trusts the book publisher
When
you write for denominational houses
they
really run the author through the theological gauntlet
One
publisher actually has an
editorial
committee
marketing
committee
and
doctrinal committee
Two of the most important ways to
connect with your reading audience
Honesty, transparency
Ernest
Hemmingway wrote that--and I’m paraphrasing--
a
good writer has a good “poop” detector
He
or is not false in anyway
I
think readers have an even more powerful poop detector
So
honesty and transparency earn you credibility
That’
probably the reason Ann Lamott is popular in both
Christian
and general markets
She
is incredibly honest and transparent
Second is Humor
There’s
even been scholarly, university studies on the effectiveness of humor
Yes, your tax dollars have actually paid for nearly
one hundred
government-funded
studies of humor.
There
is solid proof that humor increases
attention,
comprehension,
and
retention
If
we can laugh together, there’s a sense of connection
That’s
happened to me, too!
I’ve
felt that way, too!
On the stage, you have feedback; on the page you have little
I love talking to black audiences
because they talk back
“That’s
right”
“Uh
huh”
“You
preach it”
You
get into the rhythm like you’re playing tennis
You
serve an idea
and
they return the ball
With
any group, you’re receiving feedback from “yahs” to yawns,
so,
you can quickly adapt your presentation by
picking
up or slowing down the tempo,
explaining
a point that’s eliciting looks of confusion, or
skipping
minor points to quickly conclude
(if
you haven’t struck oil in twenty minutes, stop boring!).
So, as a speaker, you’re
constantly adjusting your speech
to
the audience’s reaction
At
a recent conference, a woman actually fell off her seat
laughing
She
could not stop
Then
she got me laughing
It
was hard to get back on track
Speaking creates an energy not
present in the written word.
Reading
a book or an article is a solitary experience.
But
when you are surrounded by hundreds of other people,
reacting
to the message,
there
is an energy and excitement.
And,
one theory of persuasion argues that
we
don’t know what we think
until
we sense the reactions of those around us
That
doesn’t happen with reading
Except for an occasional fan letter or what we called
“Dear
Heathen Scum” letters little feedback
So you have to solicit feedback before you write
Writing
critique groups
Make
sure it’s a critique group and no
“Say
something nice about me and I’ll say something nice
about
you.”
Focus
groups
at
WPH we would bring in actual Sunday school teachers and
teenagers
to
critique the curriculum before we ever went to press
Hire
your daughter and her friends
The
$50 bucks I paid them well worth it
“You
really don’t want to use that word?”
“Why?”
“Well,
it, ah, it doesn’t mean what you think it means to teens.”
And
of course an editor
When
I was editorial director at WPH
I
would tell the editor who worked for me
“Treat
my article like you would any other manuscript.
She
was a former English teacher with a red pen
My
manuscript would look like the “St. Valentine Day Massacre”
when
she got done.
So
to paraphrase Abraham Lincoln
“The
person who is his own editor,
has
a fool for a client.”
Editors
are our friends
Let’s
say it together, “Editor are our friends.”
I
knew you could.
So, in writing, your audience is
unseen, but it’s not un-knowable
On the stage, it’s live, it’s improvised
On the page, it’s all “canned
That’s why I’d rather be
writing or speaking
With
speaking, it’s like the Olympics
No
matter how much practice you’ve put into the talk
inevitably
there will be glitches
You
lose your place
Your
train of thought derails
A
child falls out of the balcony
It
turned out to be a doll, but really lost my timing
You’re
going to mispronounce something
“Fiery
darts” got transposed
While
speaking to a large school assembly in
I
mentioned that I “root” for the Chicago Bulls
A
stunned silence came over the audience
I
had no idea “root” in their F-word
In print, everything is in your control
and
if you don’t catch a faux pas, hopefully the editor will
In
fact, I’ve gone to doing only email interviews
I
can carefully think through the question
choose
my words
and
let it set a day or two to make sure that’s what I really
want
to say
I
get in trouble when I ad lib!
And
I’m ADD, so I can get very distracted
Which
is why my notes are also in manuscript form
So writing is a controlled, safe
environment
On the stage, you can use 4,500 words, on the page 1,500
A half hour talk will use up about
4,500 words
speaking
at 150 words per minute
In
an article or a book chapter
slash
that by one-third
You’ve
got to “write tight”
On the stage, you may speak to a thousand people
on the
page, you can easily reach 100 thousand
Speaking
may be the most effective mode of persuasion,
but
it’s not the most efficient.
For
instance, I recently spoke to one hundred people at a seminar.
I
spent a day working on the talk and
then
one day at the nearby district campground delivering it.
So,
my ratio of impact was fifty people per day.
That
same week, I spent a day writing an article for Decision
magazine which reaches 1.8 million readers.
To
reach that many at one hundred people at a time,
I
would have to speak 18,000 days in a row or
for
4,931 years!
My
ratio of impact was exponentially greater.
And there is the
advantage that the talk is somewhat permanent
when put into
print.
Every
so often I’ll get an email saying how the person
was
helped by the article
They
must have read it in a waiting room
or
were cleaning out their magazine rack
because
I wrote in ten years ago!
Online
writing is even better since it’s available indefinitely,
long
after the magazine is in the recycle bin,
to
a worldwide audience.
The New
Testament implies that Apollos was a much better speaker
than
the apostle Paul.
And
during the time of the famous preacher Charles Spurgeon,
another
pastor in
better
preacher.
So why do we
know the names of Paul and Spurgeon over
Apollos and “another pastor”?
They
both wrote!
Paul
penned nearly half the New Testament and
Spurgeon
published his weekly sermons as well as
a
monthly magazine.
In fact, we
wouldn’t have the message of God’s love and redemption or
the teachings of
Jesus Christ if not for writing!
Neither
would we have the writings of Augustine, Thomas a Kempis,
John
Wesley, C.S. Lewis, Oswald Chambers, A. W. Tozer, or hundreds others through the ages.
Parchment,
papyrus, and paper have kept the message of Christ alive and in its original,
unadulterated form.
For
the audience’s perspective, on stage a person is speaking to hundreds or
thousands; on the page the author is speaking directly to you.
Writing
is personal.
I
won a Campus Life “Book of the
Year” contest in which
the
judges were teens.
One
wrote, “Jim Watkins is not an author.” (Ouch!)
“No,
it’s more like he’s sitting across from you at
McDonalds
sharing Diet Cokes.”
(Okay,
I can live with that.)
one-on-one
“conversation” between the writer and the reader.
You’re
not sitting at a conference with a thousand others
listening
to a speaker,
but
the author is talking directly to you.
Another advantage of reading is that you set the
time and place,
as
well as the pace.
Unlike
other forms of mass communication,
even audio books,
you
can read as slowly or quickly as you like.
You
can easily go back and re-read a section that isn’t clear.
And,
you can highlight, underline, dog ear, and
make
notes in the margins in a magazine or book.
(Try
doing that with your iPpod!)
On your notes, now draw a line from
the stage side to the page side
because
there are lot of similarities
Both require a great introduction
A good lead attracts attention
Think of it as those screaming announcers on
car commercials.
“AT
CRAZY CARL’S CAR CORRAL,
WE’LL
PUT YOU IN A BRAND NEW CAR WITH
NO
MONEY DOWN, NO PAYMENTS FOR THREE MONTHS.
PLUS. . .
.”
Dr. Dennis Hensley lists
his “top ten” attention grabbers:
1. Competition
2. Conflict
3. Controversy
4. Consequences
5. Familiar or famous
people
6. Human interest
7. Humor
8. A common problem
9. Success
10. The unknown, weird,
bizarre.
Madison Avenue has its
own list of never-miss human interest:
Love
Sex
Hate
Fear
Vanity
Selfishness
Ambition
Immorality
Evildoing
Cruelty
Superstition
Curiosity
Vindication
Culture
Heroism
Science
Amusements
A good lead establishes the subject
Within a few seconds,
your audience should know the exact subject.
A good lead sets the tone
Is this a humorous
piece? Is it a scholarly work? Is it a touching personal experience story? Is
it a thriller?
A good lead doesn’t make promises it can’t keep
Back to our car commercial.