Next Steps Ministries
Partner in Learning to Advance to the Next Steps

Home • Bio • Email • Thursday Thoughts • Devotions • Sketches


Lois E. F. Watkins

All the world is a stage

An epitaph is formed by the dash

Are you asking me or telling me?

A sacrificial Christmas

Bible Wars: the board game"

Bottled water everywhere

Did I speak too much?

Do you see what I see?

Dying to live again

Embarrassment of humiliation

First responders

Give me liberty or give me . . .

Give thanks in all circumstances

God's top ten Christmas list

Great awakenings

Growing up is so very hard to do

Insider or outsider?

Introducing Next Steps Ministries

Is it real?

Jeers and cheers

Labels can be costly

Labels can be lethal

Olympic-sized what ifs

Outsider turns insider

Surviving Survivor

Red and yellow, black and white

Rush to judgment

Timing is everything

The B-I-B-L-E

The great debate

The way of suffering

This far and no farther

Unlikely beginnings

Wars and rumors of wars

What is enough

Who me, walk on water?

Who's in your car?

2007 thoughts






Thursday thoughts: 2006

What Is Enough? (December 28, 2006)
Lois E. F. Watkins

Judging by the return lines after Christmas, many people did not get enough; or at least did not get the right thing. Even with gift certificates people often get something that costs more and simply make up the difference. Never being satisfied is seems to be a modern curse.

What is there in the human spirit that drives for more, bigger, better, best? Last Christmas, as a lifetime Packer Cheesehead, I was thrilled to get an autographed 11x14 framed picture of Brett Favre. It was signed, "Lois, be the best." It is no longer sufficient to strive to be "your personal best," but now only the best or even best-est will do.

Even if being the best is attained, it can be short lived, especially in athletics. No sooner is one goal is met, one record set and new goal to break the record is set. Enter competition. In one sense competition and striving for perfection keeps the human race "progressing" but at what cost and to what end? What is the motivator? What is the purpose?

Chasing the dream of perfection

"The race for quality has no finish line--so technically, it's more like a death march" is a quote from the Demotivator Calendar by Despair, Inc. This 1998 company based in Austin, Texas, produces posters and souvenirs that satirize the motivational hype common in corporate environments. They are well-known for their cynical and ironic "Demotivator" items.

Certainly there is nothing wrong with striving for excellent quality, keeping focused, setting and meeting goals. The problem comes when excellence is attained, only to be outdone by the next person, company, church etc. Now your excellence is no longer excellent. It may be extremely good, but someone else now, perhaps briefly, carries the title of "the best." So, but when is it enough? When health is broken? When a family is fractured? When a loved one is dying? When the bottom drops out in failure?

Another Demotivator statement: "Pressure can turn a lump of coal into a flawless diamond, or an average person into a perfect basketcase." Extreme pressure and unfulfilled dreams can lead to tragic ends as in the Pultizer-prize winning play, The Death of a Salesman, written by Authur Miller in 1949. It is viewed by many as a caustic attack on the American Dream of achieving wealth and success without regard for principle. Willie Loman loses his traveling sales job because of his age and becoming a detriment to the company. His dream is shattered and his pride won't allow him to work for a neighbor's business.

In addition his son, Biff, who had been raised to believe that good looks and popularity would make him successful, confides to his father that he is no longer a leader of men and that he is just a common person who has no outstanding qualities. Willy refuses to believe him and tells Biff once again how great he can be. Rather than accept the loss of another dream, Willy resolves on suicide, because with twenty thousand dollars in insurance money, Biff could be magnificent. Willy pursued his delusions of grandeur to his death.

Pursuing spiritual perfection

Keeping the entire Jewish law perfectly was the Old Covenant standard. Because it could not be done, God instituted the sacrificial system to atone for any sins. Some simply gave up, but others kept on trying . . . and failing. Many of the "religious" continued keeping the letter of the law, but their hearts were hard and judgmental. In essence, they failed.

Just last week we celebrated birth of Jesus. God instituted the New Covenant based on receiving God's grace through faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Yet, today there are many Christian believers who cannot get it into their heart that Christ's atonement is enough. Many, like myself, were taught the right doctrine of saved by grace alone. Yet, experienced expectations of "saved by grace AND for extra insurance add lots of good works."

A continuous cycle of assumed failure-false guilt-unnecessary repentance emerged. The only conclusion could be: My best was not good enough. Another Demotivator seems to fit here: Stupidity--Quitters never win, winners never quit, but those who never win and never quit are idiots. (Remember these are to be cynical). For that very reason many, who start a walk of faith, actually do give up. But that need not be.

We all need to be reminded of the lyrics of 19th century hymn writer, Lidie H. Edmunds, in No Other Plea.

My faith has found a resting place, Not in device nor creed; I trust the Everliving One, His wounds for me shall plead.

Enough for me that Jesus saves, This ends my fear and doubt; A sinful soul, I come to Him, He'll never cast me out.

My heart is leaning on the Word, The written Word of God, Salvation by my Savior's name, Salvation through His blood.

Refrain: I need no other argument, I need no other plea; It is enough that Jesus died, And that He died for me.

New Year's reflection

With our perfect (complete) salvation attained only through God's grace, what about a Christian's motivation for excellence in accomplishments? When does Christian pursuit of the next and the next and the next begin to focus on success for success sake, rather than success for the Kingdom's sake? How does the attitude of "It is not enough" fit with Jesus teachings of the Blessed? Blessed are the poor (not necessarily in spirit), those who mourn, the meek, the hungry and thirsting for righteousness, the merciful, the pure in heart, the peacemakers, the persecuted (Matthew 5:3-11).

Where do these verses fit into daily life: "Many who are first will be last and many who are last will be first" (Matthew 19:30); "whoever wants to become great among ou must be your servant. . ." (Matthew 20:26); and "Honor one another above yourselves" (Romans 12:10b)?

May God help us to keep our motivations and desires Christ-like in 2007.

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

A Sacrificial Christmas Part 1 (December 14, 2006)
Lois E. F. Watkins

"Angel’s We Have Heard on High" and "Shepherds in the Fields Abiding" never sounded sweeter than when our tour group sang in the shepherd’s cave on the hillside on the outskirts of Bethlehem. Being confined to the cave allowed us to shut out the modern city and large cathedrals marking so many biblical places. It was almost like being there over two thousand years ago--minus the angels.

Uplifting words, such as rejoice, glory, peace, light, triumph, worship, glad tidings, hope, praise, alleluia and wonders of His love, fill the carols. What good news that wrapped up in the swaddling cloths was the Son of God, Emmanuel--God with us. No celebration or collection of carols can adequately capture the eternal changes begun on that night. However, that new day of reconciliation between God and sinner is just that--the beginning. That day’s good news depends on looking beyond the manger to the sacrifice on the cross and to the resurrection, ascension and second coming.

The other side of Christmas

While most carols focus on the event’s joyful conclusion, only a few allude to the drastic means necessary to attain this great joy. Here are some of those passing phrases: ransom captive Israel; dawn of redeeming grace; cast out our sin and enter in; the Savior reigns; no more let sin and sorrow grow; God and sinners reconciled; and born Thy people to deliver. "There’s Room in my Heart for Thee" makes the most direct reference, to the sacrifice of Christmas. "But with mocking scorn and with crown of thorn, they bore Thee to Calvary."

But even before looking forward to the cross, consider the enormous sacrifices just in God becoming human flesh; the loss of timelessness; the loss of heavenly beauty; the loss of adoration and worship; the confinement to a vulnerable human body with its limitations and physical needs; the surrender to human authorities and the list could go on and on. Basically Jesus, being in very nature God, chose to be trapped in human flesh. Why? To accomplish salvation through faith, rather than through perfectly keeping the law (impossibility) or through the blood of animals (insufficient).

On October 8, 2006 at St Paul’s Cathedral Rev. Paul Lillie noted, "The Christian story is the story of God becoming vulnerable in order that God might be close to us. The Christian story is the enmeshment of the divine with the human; it is the story of God's love being so great for us, that God chose to live a life like ours-that God chose to be as vulnerable as we are-that God chose to be like us in our weakest state-mainly death."

The high price of love

In the new movie "The Nativity Story," the magi who presents the myrrh says "for the sacrifice." God can never be accused of backing away from a necessary sacrifice to accomplish salvation purposes. Last Sunday our pastor, Steve DeNeff, preached on God’s love from Isaiah 43:3-4, "For I am the LORD, your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Savior; I give Egypt for your ransom, Cush and Seba in your stead. Since you are precious and honored in my sight, and because I love you, I will give men in exchange for you, and people in exchange for your life."

Because of God’s great love and purpose for the nation of Israel, other’s who thwarted that plan were taken in exchange. God’s plan must not be stopped. This type of exchange of one for another is found later in the sacrifice of the innocent infants. Cruel Herod had them slaughtered in order to stop this prophesied new king of the Jews from taking over his throne. Herod’s paranoia led him to the cruelty of murdering not only these innocents, but also his own family members for fear of losing his throne. Because of his cruelty innocents died and Jesus’ family was forced to flee to Egypt in order to preserve the only means of eternal salvation.

The ultimate gift of love is found it John 3:16-17, "God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him" (John 3:16-17). Since God, the Father and God the Son, along with God the Holy Spirit are one, God exchanged His own life for our own life on the cross through Jesus. Father, God was not a detached, uncaring observer. Even though Jesus felt abandoned, God was suffering with him. God’s love and sacrificial plan carried a high price.

The great exchange

Love demonstrated through sacrifice is a powerful magnetic force. As we continue on our journey toward celebrating the birth of Christ, let us also keep in mind why he was born. He was born to be with us, to show us how to live as fully human, to die for the sins of each one in the world and rise to give us new life. He came to be with us, so we would believe in him, love him and be able to be with him eternally.

Considering the sacrificial exchange Christ made on our behalf, is it too much to present our lives to Christ as a gift? Through his sacrifice he gives life and gives it abundantly. In return give God your best gift--your life! As we exchange gifts with our loved ones, perhaps at great sacrifice of time or money, may we not forget the greatest gift we can give to the greatest Giver and Lover. Put yourself under the tree as a gift for to God this Christmas. You will be surprised at the possibilities that are opened inside!

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

A Sacrificial Christmas Part 2 (December 21, 2006)
Lois E. F. Watkins

Christmas is a season of giving, which some generously continue all year long. No one would argue that Oprah Winfrey is a giving person. Of course with an annual income of $225 million and a net worth topping a billion dollars in 2003, one would hope she and other wealthy celebrities would be giving.

Among her gifts has been over $5 million for scholarships to Atlanta Morehouse College; 270 Pontiac G6 cars to audience members, who had to pay $7,000 in gift tax or give up the car; in 2004 a $4.5 million giveaway to 300 teachers (30-inch widescreen LCD TVs, washers and dryers, Sony Notebook computers and trips to a spa resort in Arizona) totaling about $15,000 per person, more than three times as much as 2003 $4,800 gift packages.

In October this year she gave 300 audience members $1,000 debit cards to donate money to a charitable cause, so they could experience the "gift of giving back." Her reason was simple, "I can honestly say that every gift I've ever given has brought at least as much happiness to me as it has to the person I've given it to. That's the feeling I want to pass on to you.”

New Year’s Eve will find her in South Africa for a huge party to celebrate the official opening of her girl’s school. USA Week-end featured a story on it last Sunday. For her $10 million dollar investment she expected some return. She was exasperated with the girls who had become distracted with their cell phones and video games. The essence of her scolding was “I have given my best for you and I expect nothing less from you.”

Sacrifice flows from one’s passions

While Oprah’s excessive giving and compassion is admirable, it would not be considered sacrificial by the strictest standard. Giving out of abundance or lack of personal need certainly gives joy, but does not cause a real loss to the giver. The gift may not even have any real value to the giver. There is always more to give. In 2001 she commented, "I've stopped wanting things and think about what I can give other people. I really have reached the point where I don't want anything. That's a good place to be, isn't it?" Perhaps an even better place would be to have little and still not want anything.

But I digress. According to Webster’s definition, sacrifice does not have to “give until it hurts.” It can be “giving up something valued for the sake of something having a more pressing claim.” We view God’s gift of Jesus as a sacrifice not because that was all there was to give. After all, God had the entire universe available to give, so all resources were not depleted.

However, Jesus was of immeasurable value as God’s own Son, God in human flesh. He was given because God’s passion for a loving relationship with each person had a “more pressing claim.” Staggering isn’t it! God’s love for you and me was of such importance, that God gave, not all he had, but all that was necessary on his part for accomplishing that goal.

In a real sense God valued our salvation more than himself. As we mentioned last week the Christmas story foreshadows God giving the ultimate sacrifice of Jesus, God in human flesh, dying on the cross for all sin, including yours and mine. This sacrifice is a gift of grace. We do not earn it, we receive it by faith when we confess our sins and allow God to forgive us and cleanse us.

Much is given—much is required

When we receive this sacrificial gift; when we are come face to face with this indescribable love; when we begin to understand “Love one another, as I have loved you” we are compelled to think and act sacrificially. For those who are not in the Billionaire or Millionaire Club, do not be dismayed. Sacrifice can, but does not necessarily require money.

Money can do wonderful things, but there are so many things that money cannot buy. As the ads for Visa emphasize, some things are simply “priceless.”

We can see it displayed when a family member or complete stranger donates an organ to save a life. Last week we had the joy of seeing a friend whose sister donated a kidney and strangers donated the pancreas of their deceased seven-year-old son. He is no longer a diseased diabetic on dialysis.

What about being an organ donor?

We see it through parents who go without in order to provide benefits for their children. For many Christmas is a time when parents sacrifice for their children either by going into debt or going without things themselves. One of my senior hospice patients shared about her father having a beautiful doll in the window of the store he owned. How she wanted that doll, but she was told it cost too much. Resigned to not getting it, she could not contain her joy when she opened it on Christmas. Her father took the loss to show his love.

What about giving for the joy of someone else’s happiness?

While we can spend money to try to give joy, how about giving a gift of time to do for someone what they cannot do for themselves or a gift of a listening ear to a heartbroken friend or a gift of being present with a lonely person or even a sincere smile to downcast stranger.

We see sacrificial love when adult children sacrifice their schedules, time or even room in their home, when parents need help in older years. I have seen enormous loving sacrifice on the part of the children as I visit hospice patients. At times the sacrifice involves much more than expected. Even then the love keeps on giving. Some children even take on responsibilities far beyond their years when a younger parent is ill or out of work.

We see sacrifice in the love of strangers who donate coats, toys, food, time and money to help the less fortunate; a prisoner’s children have gifts; the homeless have a meal; the nursing home resident feel remembered or a widow have companionship. We see it lived out in the lives of men and women in the military who will spend Christmas away from home to protect and defend their loved ones at home.

The best Christmas gift would be to make sacrificial giving a lifestyle rather than a season!

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

God's Top Ten Christmas List (November 30, 2006)
Lois E. F. Watkins

Last week’s absence of a new Thursday Thought was because I was with Jim at a writer’s conference on the cruise ship, Carnival Liberty, in the western Caribbean. With palm trees, rain forests and temperatures in the mid to high 80’s it was hard to remember that Advent season had begun. However, dropping 70 degrees from Fort Lauderdale to Marion Sunday evening and getting our first covering of snow last night has reinforced the reality of Christmas in Indiana.

Unfortunately my brain still seems to be at sea. Fortunately there are lots of great thoughts and greater writers out there. I received the following e-mail from a friend, which originally appeared on “Allrown’s Blog” (http://blufftontoday.com/user/341) November 19 as a “Letter from God to His Children.”

+ + +

Dear Children,

It has come to my attention that many of you are upset that folks are taking My name out of the season. Maybe you've forgotten that I wasn't actually born during this time of the year and that it was some of you're predecessors who decided to celebrate My birthday on what was actually a time of pagan festival; although, I do appreciate being remembered anytime.

How I personally feel about this celebration can probably be most easily understood by those of you who have been blessed with children of your own. I don't care what you call the day. If you want to celebrate My birth just, GET ALONG AND LOVE ONE ANOTHER. Now, having said that let Me go on.

If it bothers you that the town in which you live doesn't allow a scene depicting My birth, then just get rid of a couple of Santa's and snowmen and put in a small Nativity scene on your own front lawn. If all My followers did that there wouldn't be any need for such a scene on the town square because there would be many of them all around town.

Stop worrying about the fact that people are calling the tree a holiday tree, instead of a Christmas tree. It was I who made all trees. You can and may remember Me anytime you see any tree. Decorate a grape vine if you wish: I actually spoke of that one in a teaching that explains who I am in relation to you and what each of our tasks are. If you have forgot that one, look at John 15:1-8.

If you want to give Me a present in remembrance of My birth here is my wish list. Choose something from it.

1. Instead of writing protest letters objecting to the way My birthday is being celebrated, write letters of love and hope to soldiers away from home. They are terribly afraid and lonely this time of year. I know, they tell Me all the time.

2. Visit someone in a nursing home. You don't have to know them personally. They just need to know that someone cares about them.

3. Instead of writing George complaining about the wording on the cards his staff sent out this year, why don't you write and tell him that you'll be praying for him and his family this year. Then follow up. It will be nice hearing from you again.

4. Instead of giving your children a lot of gifts you can't afford and they don't need, spend time with them. Tell them the story of My birth and why I came to live with you down here. Hold them in your arms and remind them that I love them.

5. Pick someone that has hurt you in the past and forgive him or her.

6. Did you know that someone in your town will attempt to take their own life this season because they feel so alone and hopeless? Since you don't know who that person is, try giving everyone you meet a warm smile it could make the difference. Also, you might consider supporting the local Hot-Line: they talk with people like that every day.

7. Instead of nit picking about what the retailer in your town calls the holiday, be patient with the people who work there. Give them a warm smile and a kind word. Even if they aren't allowed to wish you a "Merry Christmas" that doesn't keep you from wishing them one. Then stop shopping there on Sunday. If the store didn't make so much money on that day they'd close and let their employees spend the day at home with their families.

8. If you really want to make a difference, support a missionary, especially one who takes My love and Good News to those who have never heard My name. You may already know someone like that.

9. Here's a good one. There are individuals and whole families in your town who not only will have no "Christmas" tree, but neither will they have any presents to give or receive. If you don't know them (and I suspect you don't) buy some food and a few gifts and give them to the Marines, the Salvation Army or some other charity that believes in Me and they will make the delivery for you.

10. Finally if you want to make a statement about your belief in and loyalty to Me, then behave like a Christian. Don't do things in secret that you wouldn't do in My presence. Let people know by your actions that you are one of mine.

P.S. Don't forget; I am God and can take care of Myself. Just love Me and do what I have told you to do. I'll take care of all the rest. Check out the list above and get to work; time is short. I'll help you, but the ball is now in your court. And do have a most blessed Christmas with all those you love and, remember, I LOVE YOU.

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Give Thanks in All Circumstances (November 23, 2006)
Lois E. F. Watkins

Happy Thanksgiving! On the news a turkey hotline for people to call with questions was featured. One time a newlywed called in for help. She was calling from the closet so her mother-in-law wouldn’t know she needed help.

Here are some kid’s recipes for turkey. I hope they are not working the hotline!

Geremy - You buy the turkey and take the paper off. Then you put it in the refrigerator and take it back out and cut it with a knife and make sure all the wires are out and take out the neck and heart. Then you put it in a big pan and cook it for half an hour at 80 degrees. Then you invite people over and eat.

Moriah - First you cut the bones out. Then you put it in the oven for 10 hours at 600 degrees. Then you put it on the table and eat it.

Grace - First you add some salt. Then you put it in a bowl. Then you put brown sugar on it. Then you mix it all together with a spoon and then you add some milk and mix it again. And then you put it in a pan. Then you put it in the oven for 15 minutes and 16 degrees. Then you take it out of the oven and then you eat it.

Lauren - First you find a turkey and kill it. Cut it open. Put it in a pan. Pour milk in the pan. Put a little chicken with it. Put salsa on it. Take out of pan. Put it on the board. Cut into little pieces. Put on a rack. Put in the oven for 7 minutes at 10 degrees. Take out of the oven and put eensy weensy bit of sugar on it. Put a little more salsa on it. Then you eat it.

And when the meal is over you can share these turkey jokes:

What the leftover turkey said after it was wrapped up and refrigerated, “Foiled again.”

What do you call a gobbler who thinks he knows everything? A smirky turkey

Show us the man who throws Thanksgiving leftovers in the garbage and we’ll show you a man who quits cold turkey.

Thanks for what?

Even if laughter is healthy, perhaps on this Thanksgiving Day you don’t feel much like laughing or being thankful. When you read I Thessalonians 5:18, “Give thanks in all circumstances, which is God’s will for you in Christ Jesus,” it seems like a cruel joke. Perhaps you are among those suffering unimaginable pain and loss. Or perhaps your heart breaks for others living through a death, war, abuse, disease or natural disasters.

Before giving up on God as a masochist, read the verse again--slowly. Notice it says, “give thanks ‘in’ all circumstances, rather than ‘for’ all circumstances.” No, it is not merely semantics. There is a real difference.

When I am give thanks “for” a circumstance, I am pleased and appreciative. This person or thing has met a need or gone above and beyond expectations. When I give thanks “in” all circumstances, I do not necessarily like what happened. I may even detest what happened. Giving thanks is not because of the circumstances, but regardless of the circumstance.

Giving thanks focuses beyond the event to trusting a loving, compassionate God whose ways are higher than ours (Isaiah 55:8-9). This type of thanks does not deny pain or inhibit natural human reactions. It does not call us to go through life as zombies. Rather Brennan Manning encourages us to sense the presence of God in the present step.

Real-life example

Recently I heard Nate Saint share his story. If you have seen the movie, "The End of the Spear," he was the five-year-old whose missionary father was killed by the then-savage Indians in Ecuador (1958). One part of the story I'd forgotten was that the missionaries did have guns, but chose not to use them. Their willful self-sacrifice spoke volumes. If they had killed the Indians to save themselves, they would have lived, but that tribe would have continued in hatred, killing and death. When Nate’s Aunt, Rachel, and one of the widows, Elizabeth Elliot, went back to the tribe after the deaths, their message of God's love and forgiveness was believable.

Did these families give thanks for the deaths of their loved ones? No! Did they give thanks in the circumstances because they trusted God to work in and through the tragedy? Yes. By choosing not to become bitter and vengeful, a new tribe will be present before the throne of God (Revelation 7:9).

A little child will lead them

The following is a summary of an October 2006 article in Open Doors, a magazine which informs and mobilizes people on behalf of the persecuted church. For the whole article go to http://odusa.org/Display.asp?Page=ff_2005_10_feat

In China a children’s Sunday school class was raided and more than 30 children were taken to the police station. The children had been warned this might happen. As the van sped toward the police station, one child started singing. Then, the van was filled with song as all the children enthusiastically joined in. Upon arrival at the police station, the children marched bravely into the interrogation room still singing, "In the name of Jesus, we have the victory."

The police interrogator began to threaten the children, telling them they would have to write "I do not believe in Jesus" one hundred times before he would release them. Instead, the defiant children wrote, "I believe in Jesus today. I will believe in Jesus tomorrow. I will believe in Jesus forever!"

A Thanksgiving thought to chew on

Thomas Merton wrote, “Those who are not thankful for (in) everything, will start to complain about everything.”

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

The Way of Suffering (November 15, 2006)
Lois E. F. Watkins

Perhaps today’s title has turned you off and tempted you to skip ahead to more uplifting or urgent messages. The title reflects the meaning of the words Via Dolorosa (also the Way of Grief, the Path of Sorrow, the Way of the Cross) as well as the fact that last Sunday was the International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church. In 1996 World Evangelical Alliance coordinated the prayer efforts of 7,000 churches, which has grown to be the largest prayer day of its kind in the world with over 100,000 churches, representing nearly every U.S. denomination, as well as Christians in over 130 countries.

Unfortunately it is a day of remembrance that many western churches would probably prefer to ignore. Being reminded of the stark reality of Christian discrimination, persecution, torture and death around the world doesn’t lend itself to the health, wealth and prosperity gospel preached by many. A “feel good” theology is hard to reconcile with experiences of pain, suffering, sorrow and death.

Yet, amid this flagrant disregard for human rights, the Church of Jesus Christ is multiplying. There is a depth of joy and peace that cannot be known outside of an equal depth of sorrow and distress. Because these believers have so little, they are so grateful for the little they have. While suffering and pain are excruciating, the stories of faith and courage are abundant, even victory through death. Ironically, the message of the Persecuted Church is both uplifting (in a strange sort of way) and urgent.

Following the example of Jesus

Believers in Jesus, who live out their faith in a culture that forbids it, are most closely following the literal example of Jesus Christ as he walked the Via Dolorosa, taking the Way of Suffering. After the trials before Pilate, Herod and back to Pilate for sentencing, Jesus, bloodied and exhausted from no sleep and a vicious beating, carried the cross along the streets of Jerusalem. This traditional uphill path of .16 miles is followed every Friday by Franciscan monks.

Our schedule did not permit us to walk the entire Via Dolorosa. However we did go to one of the Stations of the Cross. A small chapel marks the place where Jesus’ battered body fell beneath the weight of the cross.

Inside the chapel two murals portray two similar, yet very different perspectives. As we entered the mural at the front of the church shows Jesus fallen beneath the cross. Surrounding him is a host of angels with bowed heads and folded wings. The posture of the angels gives a sense of deep sorrow and helplessness. Angels had ministered to Jesus after his temptation and in the garden. But here they were not allowed to intervene. Jesus was required to bear his cross with no supernatural help.

As we turned to leave the chapel, another mural showed Jesus fallen beneath the cross. However instead of angels there was a host of Christian believers each one carrying a cross along with Jesus. What a powerful way to depict Luke 9:23 “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me.” Matthew 10:38 gives the same command in a negative format, “anyone who does not take up his cross daily and follow me is not worthy of me.”

Take up your cross

So how can one who lives in a nation that to date still honors freedom of religion take up his or her cross? Although many experience physical limitations and great suffering; face the grief over the loss of loved ones; deal with difficult and painful relationships, which may include betrayal and rejection; contend with some limited political oppression; most have not yet overtly suffered for the name of Christ.

Every person has a unique cross to bear that requires faithfulness and obedience “even to death on a cross” Philippians 2:8. For many of our brothers and sisters around the world death is required for their faith. Part of carrying our cross is to do all we can to help carry theirs. Galatians 6:2 commands us to “carry one another’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ.”

Avenues to accomplish this are to pray, learn, give and take appropriate action. The following partner organizations have websites, which give abundant practical ways to make a difference in the life of the Persecuted Church: Christian Freedom International, Christian Solidarity Worldwide, Christians in Crisis, Gospel for Asia, International Christian Concern, Iranian Christians International, Jubilee Campaign, Open Doors, The Voice of the Martyrs, World Evangelical Alliance.

Prayer is an obvious place to begin. During one IDOP service we divided the congregation into prayer groups and assigned each one a specific country. Interceding for the needs of specific countries and individuals by name brings the reality close to home. The websites above share many prayer concerns, so our prayers can be targeted and effective.

We can help Open Doors reach these goals (other groups have similar goals):

Providing Bibles and literature, media, leadership training, socio-economic development and through intercessory prayer;

Preparing the Body of Christ living in threatened or unstable areas to face persecution and suffering; and

Educating and mobilizing the Body of Christ living in the free world to identify with threatened and persecuted Christians and be actively involved in assisting them.

A great need among persecuted Christians is a Bible for strength, wisdom and courage. God’s Word is powerful. It will not return empty; “my word that goes out from my mouth (it) will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it” Isaiah 55:11.

Does it do any good?

Some might wonder if persecution multiplies the church, then do we really want to try to end it. Others might ask, “Does it do any good? Can prayer, resources, funds and workers change national policies?” Perhaps, but if not it certainly saves lives and emboldens witnesses.

Share in this closing prayer for the Third Station of the Cross: Almighty and everlasting God, in Christ You have revealed Your glory to all nations; guard the works of Your mercy, that Your Church, spread over the whole world, may with constant faith persevere in the confession of Your name. Through Christ our Lord. Amen

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

The Great Debate (November 9, 2006)
Lois E. F. Watkins

For months our granddaughter has used "Uh-oh!" to describe little mishaps and "Oh, no!" for bigger mishaps. Recently a simple "No!" has been added as she is learning to express her opinion and exert her independence. Knowing this is a normal part of child development for an eighteen-month old does not make it any easier. Sweet compliance is much easier.

Greater wisdom and patience is needed to determine when she is being an imp by teasing; when she is testing our limits and sincerity; and when she is seems to be knowingly disobedient. Each situation takes a unique course of action. At times even accepting her "No!" is in order, as well as allowing the natural consequences. Freedom to make right choices often follows the freedom to make a wrong choice.

Being able to say "No!" goes hand in hand with having free-will. A person has to be able to "No!" to make choosing "Yes!" a real option. Otherwise we become mere puppets. Saying, "Yes!" to a marriage proposal holds little meaning unless the real option of saying, "No!" was also present.

As we learn to exert our will in making decisions, we struggle with whether to obey or disobey our parents, our teachers and our civil laws.

Often the greatest debate between "yes" and "no" is internalized with our conscience. A person raised with a knowledge of God understands the reality of debating with God: to obey or disobey.

As I stood looking in at the Garden of Gethsemane that great debate became real in my mind. Of course seeing the opening scene of Mel Gibson's, "The Passion of the Christ," helped envision it. Too often we dismiss the agonizing struggle, the debate Jesus had concerning going to the cross. We almost lapse into believing that it really was not that big a deal for Jesus because after all he was God. He knew what was on the other side of the cross, so why sweat it.

Somehow we convince ourselves that even through Jesus knew he would die, it couldn't be as bad for him as it is for other human beings because he was God. Philippians 2:5-8 refutes that thinking and is clear that Jesus did not cling to his rights as God and willingly took on the human body with all of its limitations, even suffering a death on a cross.

Everyone would acknowledge that being crucified was the most torturous form of execution. Perhaps because of our discomfort with extreme pain and suffering, we want to believe Jesus had some extra-special, extra-human ability to withstand the suffering. We tend to at least partially unhumanize Jesus from the Garden to the Cross. We hope that somehow he took off some of his humanity, at least some of the pain sensors. Perhaps using his divinity almost like an invisibility cloak to put on in great time of need and take it off when life wasn't too bad.

Luke 22:43 does say that an angel from heaven appeared to him to strengthen him in the Garden, but that is God's mercy extended to the human race. It is not a "special favor" just for Jesus. Many have experienced God's strengthening in times of crisis and may have even had angelic help without realizing it.

In Matthew 26 and Luke 22 we read phrases like, "My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death" or "Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me" or "being in anguish, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood." So was this play acting simply to identify with humanity? Or was it as real and heart-felt as any time you and I have cried out in agony to God? Jesus' desire and request to avoid the cross was as genuine as when you and I plead to be spared pain, suffering and death.

Truth be told, Jesus did not want to go to the cross. He was willing, but not if there was any alternative. Although he probably knew the answer, he still had the freedom to ask for the cup to be removed. In his full humanity he had free-will to refuse the cup. If you don't believe that, then the crucifixion becomes merely a puppet being sacrificed by the master.

Not being eager to obey in difficult circumstances is not a sin. It is human. Some Christians have been guilted into thinking that if they are less than ecstatic to obey God, they are failing God. Somehow they feel their obedience is negated by any hint of reservation or unhappiness with God's plan.

A false notion that Christians are to be happy all the day, even when facing the direst of circumstances, dehumanizes our emotions. It creates a very unhealthy denial of authentic and legitimate feelings. False guilt replaces what otherwise should be a celebration for obeying.

Jesus tells a story of two sons who were asked by their father to work in the vineyard (Matthew 21:28-32). The first said "I will not," but later changed his mind and went to work. The second said, "I will, sir," but then did not go. The one who did not want to work, but still obeyed was honored. The moment of truth comes from what we willingly choose to do, not how we feel about it nor the struggle we had in getting to that place of obedience.

With your minds eye or by looking at a picture, go to the Garden of Gethsemane. It is a beautiful, quiet place with olive trees that date back at least to the first century. You cannot physically go in because the rod iron fence keeps the public away to protect the garden. (People were taking leaves, bark, stones and flowers as souvenirs or sacred relics.)

But do not let the beauty of the place diminish the reality of the great debate that occurred there. While Jesus was not rebellious or disrespectful with the Father, he demonstrates how to express genuine feelings and desires, while remaining surrendered to carrying out God's will. Take your greatest struggle to obey into the garden. Agonize in a debate with God. Jesus did. When you freely choose to surrender, you will have a new resolve and determination to face what lies ahead.

(c) 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

An Epitaph Is Formed by the Dash (November 2, 2006)
Lois E. F. Watkins

Halloween is past, which brings no sadness to me. It is not my favorite holiday. However, this year was extra special as we went through a Halloween zoo with our two grandchildren and parents. "Giraffe" Micah and "Piglet" Hannah put each ticket in the buckets and got their treats. (Click here for pics.) At eighteen months they won't remember it, but we adults certainly will, and the pictures will help when memory fades.

One knoll had several tombstones with interesting epitaphs. Perhaps you have seen them on the internet or in Jim's book, The Why Files: Is there Really Life After Death?

Here lies Johnny Yeast, Pardon me for not rising.

In New Orleans, Louisiana: This is what I expected, but not so soon.

Comedian W. C. Fields allegedly wrote his own epitaph: All things considered, I'd rather be in Philadelphia.

In Nantucket, Massachusetts: Under the sod and under the trees,
Lies the body of Jonathan Pease. He is not here, there's only the pod:
Pease shelled out and went to God.

When walking through a cemetery, do you ever wonder about the cause of death? These leave no doubt!

In Uniontown, Pennsylvania: Here lies the body of Jonathan Blake;
Stepped on the gas instead of the brake.

On John Barrymore's monument: See? I told you I was sick.

In Tombstone, AZ: Here lies Lester Moore. Four slugs from a .44. No les. No more.

Finally from Leadville, Colorado (with friends like these, who needs enemies):
Amos Rutledge hanged himself. We would have done it for him.

Nowadays some headstones have a picture of the person, intricate etchings of the person's home, hobbies, or names of children. Most only have a birth date and a death date with a dash in between indicating everything that occurred in a person's life. Only those who have known the person will ever know the value of the dash.

"The Dash" is a poem written by Linda Ellis during a lunch break in 1998. It is only 239 words in 36 lines, but captures the significance of life. She was prompted to write it because of an overwhelming sense that people's priorities were skewed. Wanting to be remembered for cars, houses, and money had replaced a desire to be remembered for how we treat others: respect, love, appreciation, and understanding. She challenges people to consider what is true and real, as well as keeping in mind that each day we are adding to our own eulogy.

While it is beneficial to reflect on what we want people to remember about us or what we are doing to make ourselves memorable, let's look instead at the life of Jesus from the perspective of "One Solitary Life" by Dr. James Allen Francis. Last week's "Thursday Thoughts" focused on that obscure village of Bethlehem, where Jesus Christ was born. Having the opportunity to visit Bethlehem, as well as many sites within the less than 200 miles where Jesus did his teaching and miracles reinforced how unremarkable this life was from a worldly perspective.

Since mid-June these thoughts have focused on places we visited where Jesus lived and taught. In future weeks our thoughts will focus on various sites and events in Jerusalem, but for today consider the whole of Jesus' life. He truly had no credentials of greatness. He experienced the common human realities of being common and unknown, facing temptation, enjoying admiration and praise, feeling grief, noting accomplishments, knowing weariness, seeing God's power, bearing rejection, sensing God's pleasure, receiving mockery, enduring suffering, sensing God's abandonment, and experiencing death.

In the closing chapters of the Gospels three simple and profound statements form a powerful epitaph:

1. "Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews" (John 19:19)--Pilate's notice placed above his head on the cross. This statement places Jesus squarely in the course of history. He belongs to a town, to a race, to a people. Yet, he is also the fulfillment of centuries of prophecies given at previous times in history. He is of the line of King David and it was promised that his kingdom would never end (II Samuel 7:16). At the same time the statement itself can be seen as a prophecy, pointing to a time when Jesus will be recognized and crowned as King.

2. "Surely he was the Son of God" (Matthew 27:54) or "Surely this was a righteous man" (Luke 23:47)--spoken by the centurion after the death of Jesus. Both statements refer to the spiritual nature and obedience of Jesus. A Roman soldier recognized the inner character of Christ, beyond his earthly descriptions. Dying on the cross as the Son of God and a righteous man put his entire life and mission in perspective. Forgiveness of sin is something only God can do (Psalm 130:4, Mark 2:5-7). There is no forgiveness without the shedding of blood (Hebrews 9:22). Jesus provided both the means and the authority to forgive sin.

3. "He is not here; he is risen" (Matthew 28:6)--spoken by the angel to the women at the empty tomb. No other statement better characterizes the power and eternal nature of Jesus. Jesus was here, but is no longer here in the sense of being physically dead. He is risen to new life, which in turn gives new life to all who believe on Jesus' name.

Epitaph for Jesus: King of the Jews; righteous, Son of God; risen from the dead!

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Unlikely Beginnings (October 26, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

"Mighty oaks from little acorns grow" is an adage highlighting how great things can have small beginnings. Babies remind me of little acorns with so much potential for growth and greatness. Watching eight children between the ages of five months and five years, plus three more between six and fourteen at a recent family reunion, gave me reason to reflect on little acorns.

Although each child has some shared DNA from my parents, yet each one is his or her own person. Personalities, environments and experiences are already making their marks. What will each one will become? Only time, choices made and God's grace will reveal whether the little acorns become mighty oaks or something less grand. No matter the outcome, each one is loved deeply by God, family and friends.

Unlikely beginnings of Jesus

A little, cave-like stable in the little town of Bethlehem is an unlikely place to begin "The Greatest Story Ever Told." Micah 5:2 emphasizes its small reputation, "But you, Bethlehem, Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are form of old, from ancient times." Bethlehem became the birthplace of baby Jesus, a "little acorn" who became a "mighty oak" known as Jesus Christ, God's Son, Savior, King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

Today, modern Bethlehem is not so little anymore with a population of 40,000 including suburbs. It is one of the most popular cities on Israel tours. The Grotto of the Nativity had an ornate church built over it in the early fourth century. The actual birth place is not a plain-looking stable and the scents are not of animals, but of incense.

A 14-point silver star embedded in white marble marks the exact spot on the floor. It bears the inscription, Hic de Virgine Maria Jesus Christus natus est -- Here Jesus Christ was born to the Virgin Mary. Red, plush draperies trimmed in gold surround the birth place. The nearby spot for the manger has a golden grate in front of it. Fifteen red lamps burn around the recess. (While the décor is fit for the King of Kings, it is hard to envision the biblical account in such a place.)

From a little town of no prestige; from an animal shelter which became a birthplace by default because there was no room in the inn; from a birth of little renown, except to the common shepherds who received an angelic proclamation; from everything little and insignificant that night came God's solution to restoring the broken relationship with sinful people. God's own Son became human flesh and lived among us. He lived, died for our sins and rose to new life. ". . . to all who receive him, to those who believe in his name, he gave the right to become the children of God" John 1:12.

Unlikely beginnings of Abraham Lincoln

History is full of people with unlikely beginnings, who began with hardly as much promise as little acorns. Two upcoming events bring Abraham Lincoln to mind as having an unlikely beginning: elections on November 7 and Thanksgiving Day on November 23 (first national Thanksgiving Day was during his presidency).

Ever since elementary school, I have been impressed that someone like Lincoln could rise to President of the United States. Reading "Love is Eternal" by Irving Stone, which is a historical novel of Abraham and Mary Todd Lincoln, reinforced that admiration. The shear volume of obstacles he faced made him an unlikely candidate for greatness.

Most are familiar with his lowly beginnings in a Kentucky log cabin on a bed of poles with a corn husk mattress. At age seven a friend saved him from drowning. At nine his mother died. At ten a horse kicked him, and he nearly died. At fifteen his sister died. Is it any wonder he suffered from bouts of depression and melancholy?

Schooling was limited. His uneducated father actually opposed it by saying, "I suppose you're still foolin' yourself with eddication. I tried to stop you, but you got that fool idea in your head and it can't be got out." Lincoln read the family Bible and borrowed neighbor's books. At fifteen, he walked a mile and a half to the general store to read the newspapers to know what was happening in the world. Later he read and studied himself to a law degree. Passion for learning and shear determination prepared him for future opportunities.

Neither good looks, nor good social skills helped his cause. Honesty and integrity moved him from rail splitter, to joint operator of a general store (which failed), post master, assistant surveyor, lawyer and politician. He lost his first bid for Illinois House of Representatives, failed to be appointed as commissioner of the General Land Office and lost two senate races before winning the presidency.

As great as being president should be, it was not to be a happy time. In less than two months the Civil War broke out with massive losses on both sides. His entire first term was filled with defeats, criticism, false accusations, the death of a son and rejection by his wife's Kentucky family, many of whom died fighting for the Confederate cause.

Re-election, a second inauguration on March 4, 1865, and encouraging events on the battle field gave hope for a better second term. April 9 General Lee surrendered to General Grant at Appomatox. April 14 Abraham Lincoln was assassinated during a play at Ford Theater. Circumstances almost kept him from attending that night.

Taking any slice of Lincoln's life, it would be easy to misjudge him as a failure, or at least less than a mighty oak. Yet his perseverance, reliance on God for wisdom and strength, and his never-ending pursuit of freedom for slaves resulted in having the authority to sign the Emancipation Proclamation. We will never know if his fame was heightened because of his death or if even greater things would have been accomplished had he lived.

What stands out to me is the danger of underestimating the potential of a person with unlikely beginnings. Poverty, lack of educational opportunities, failures, even war and death do not stop a mighty oak from developing. Perhaps they even help! Even in the midst of multiple obstacles, eventual greatness is still possible. "The (Lord) said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness" II Corinthians 12:9.

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Bible Wars: The Board Game (October 19, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

With Christmas just around the corner, I have a great idea for an entertaining and educational board game: BIBLE WARS. The purpose of the game is to give the players an appreciation for the challenges Bible translators have faced throughout history, as well as learn to value the best-selling book with the greatest story ever told.

From the "Start" square a path winds around the board ending at a square called "Favorite Bible." The goal is to get your version be the Favorite Bible by reaching the end first. The marker pieces represent various translations. King James Version is a king's crown. The American Standard Version is an American flag. The New International Version is a globe. The Jerusalem Version is a temple. The Phillips Version is a screwdriver. Rieu’s Penguin Bible is a penguin (what else?).

The game itself comes in two versions: "with dice" for the liberals and "with spinner" for the conservatives. As a player progresses around the board there, are two squares to avoid. "Go into Exile" means a new monarch is on the throne. To avoid beheading or burning at the stake, the player must flee to a safe haven and miss a turn. "Manuscript Burning" means your version has been burned as heretical and the player must start over.

When a player lands on a "Bible Translator" square, a question card is taken. If the answer is correct the player advances two spaces. If the answer is incorrect, the player goes backward one space. One additional twist of excitement involves special Bible Translator squares. These squares allow the person who lands on it to challenge another player to answer the question. A correct answer allows the challenged person to advance two squares and the challenger to go back one square; an incorrect answer brings the opposite result.

A Bible Translator card would have questions like this: (answers are at the bottom.)

1. In what year did the King James Version become authorized?
a. 1776
b. 1611
c. 1812
d. 1234

2. Which of these is NOT a published version of the Bible?
a. Cotton Patch
b. Plainer Bible
c. The Reader’s Digest Bible
d. The Word Made Flesh

3. What invention did more for making the Bible known than any other?
a. the moveable type printing press
b. the ball-point pen
c. the video projector for showing the Jesus film
d. the mimeograph machine

4. What Bible translator was burned at the stake as a heretic?
a. John Wycliffe
b. William Tyndale
c. Miles Coverdale
d. William Whittingham

5. From what language to what language did Jerome translate the Old Testament?
a. Hebrew to Greek
b. Greek to English
c. Hebrew to Latin
d. Greek to Latin

Speaking of Jerome reminds me of being in Bethlehem. That may seem strange since Bethlehem’s claim to fame is The Church of the Nativity, which covers the cave-stable where Jesus was born. But nearby is the Church of St. Catherine. From this church, medieval stairs lead down into a complex of caves and tombs linked to the Grotto of the Nativity.

The main altar in this subterranean complex is devoted to Saint Joseph, the earthly father of Christ. Next to it, the Chapel of the Innocents commemorates the children who were slaughtered by Herod after the Holy Family had left. Also off St. Joseph's chapel is the Tomb of Saint Jerome (ca. 347-420 AD), a priest who arrived in Bethlehem from Rome in 386 AD.

Our group gathered in the adjoining room where he had secluded himself to study the Bible and begin a translation of the Old Testament from Hebrew to Latin. He said this cave-like cell was the holiest place on earth due to its proximity to the place where Christ was born. He spent his last 34 years in this primitive place studying, translating and writing commentaries.

His flair for the languages: Greek, Latin and Hebrew, as well as his dedication to Bible translation are unequalled. Previously Latin translations of the Old Testament were done from the Greek Septuagint (ca. 250 BC), rather than going back to the original Hebrew texts (see last week's Thursday Thoughts). The resulting translation became known as the Vulgate because it was written in the common or vulgar tongue of the people. It was to become the official version of the Old Testament used by the Roman Catholic Church for the next 1,500 years.

A thousand years would pass before there was an English Bible published by John Wycliffe in 1380. He used Jerome's Vulgate for the basis of his translation as did many English translators. William Tyndale chose to go back to the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and made the first translation into Modern vs Middle English (1526 NT and 1530 parts of OT).

It is estimated that nine-tenths of the King James Version (1611) is Tyndale’s translation. For the next three hundred years revisions of the Authorized Version flourished until there was a Revised English and then an American Revised Version. When the twentieth century started, the translations multiplied like rabbits as in the Cotton Patch Version (1968). Over one hundred different translations or paraphrases have been published since 1900.

And so the Bible wars are raging, as to what is the "one and only, true, right and Holy Bible" version. Most every version has a niche and meets a need. Of most importance is that we read the Bible in a form that is meaningful and understandable. If something sounds wrong, read more than one version. There are Bibles that have multiple versions in columns to read side-by-side. Ask questions, study, listen to God’s Spirit and obey what you do understand.

As Mark Twain said, "It is not the parts of the Bible I don’t understand that bother me. It is the parts I do understand."

Game answers: 1.b 2.d 3.a 4.b 5.c

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

The B-I-B-L-E: more than a children's song (September 28, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

Singing “Jesus Loves Me” and “The B-I-B-L-E” to our nearly 18-month old granddaughter is a delight. I love to hear her say “Bible” at the end of the songs. I pray that she will learn to love and obey God. I pray she will become both a reader and doer of the B-I-B-L-E. I also pray she will recognize Scripture as God-breathed, unlike and unequaled by any strictly human publication.

Modern translations and paraphrases have worked wonders in bringing God’s Word to the common reader. However a serious caution is in order: Because the Bible is commonly available in common language for the common reader, it is not a common book. A constant tension exists between making the Bible more easily understood and maintaining the content and intent of the most reliable manuscripts.

Discoveries in Qumran

Our visit to the mountainous, desert site of Qumran was somewhat less meaningful due to extreme heat and “Petra belly” or some type of intestinal bug. However, the incredible significance of the Dead Sea scrolls being found there was not lost to us. In 1947 two Bedouin shepherds accidentally entered a cave near Khirbet Qumran and found a clay jar, which contained seven parchment scrolls.

Fortunately, they were recognized as valuable and turned over to scholars. In addition to translation work, archaeologists searched forty more caves in the area. In eleven caves many scrolls and thousands of fragments were found. Some scrolls describe the life of the Qumran community such as the Manual of Discipline and the War scroll. Many others are Hebrew Scriptures.

Two Isaiah scrolls were found in Cave 1, which date to the second century BC. Before that all but a couple of the existing biblical manuscripts dated from the ninth and tenth century AD. Even though the scrolls are one thousand years earlier than previous texts, they are substantially the same.

In Cave 11 a Psalm scroll was found with forty-one canonical psalms. Also found was a commentary on the book of Habakkuk, which includes the biblical text phrase by phrase before each comment. Every book of the Old Testament, except Esther, has been found among the fragments of over one hundred scrolls.

High regard for Scripture

Jewish rabbis had such a high regard for the sacred Scriptures that when they began to show wear and tear they were disposed of reverently. Since such incredible care was taken in making the copies, there was no concern for keeping the old ones to insure accuracy. Scribes had the sacred duty of meticulously hand copying official manuscripts.

Strict rules were established and still in use during the Talmudic period (200-500 AD). No word or letter was to be written from memory. Each word was to be pronounced out loud before it was written. Every word and letter was counted. Each new copy was to be revised within thirty days and if more than three errors were found on any single sheet, the roll was condemned to be redone.

Observing the reverence and seriousness with which scribes and translators have worked over the years causes me to wonder if we haven’t grown flippant in our view of Scripture. In how many Bible studies do we hear phrases like, “It says somewhere in there . . .” or “It says something like . . .” or “I think it meant to say . . .” to preface a point? Is it possible that we have become over familiar with the text, yet no longer really know what it says?

A desire to make it known

One of the recurring and overarching themes of the Bible is God’s desire to be known. Interestingly, the unfolding development of copying and translating biblical texts follows a similar theme. For the most part, a deep desire to make God’s Word known, thus helping us better know God, motivated those who undertook biblical translation. Volumes have been written on how the biblical texts came to us, including From Ancient Tablets to Modern Translations by Dr. David Ewert.

A few things stand out to me, which cause a deeper appreciation and respect for the text itself, as well as those who labored to preserve and make the texts more knowable. With concern for losing or distorting the oral pronunciation of words, the painstaking job of making word divisions was added. Originally all the letters ran together. How would you read, GODISNOWHERE? Is it GOD IS NOW HERE? Or GOD IS NOWHERE? Quite a difference!

Out of respect for the text, if something was not quite clear, any clarification or preferred reading was put in the margin, leaving the original. In this way the text could be better understood without altering the text. A detailed system for noting any variation from the text was developed. That is why many Bibles have footnotes referring to various manuscripts.

Another important addition was called “pointing” where four Hebrew consonants doubled for vowels, since there are no Hebrew vowels. Depending on which vowel was to be used certain markings were made over one of those four consonants. Again how would you transcribe BD? Is it BAD? BED? BID? BUD? It is pretty safe to assume it is not BOD! What a huge step in making it more knowable by preserving the correct pronunciation and meaning.

It's our turn to make it known

We have been given the Scriptures as a great gift, first given by God to inspired writers and handed down through the painstaking labor of transcribers and translators, who gave their lives (some literally) for us to have the Bible. As recipients of a Bible that is written in our language, is abundantly available and much more easily understood, we now have a sacred duty.

1. Read the Bible with a desire to know the Author and make the Author known.

2. Study to better understand Scripture in its historical and cultural context.

3. Ask the Holy Spirit to make it a living word; then obey it and apply it today.

4. Support efforts to continue translating and delivering Scriptures to the many places where it is desperately needed and desired.

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Embarrassment or humiliation (September 21, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

Extreme embarrassment is a real risk of traveling to other countries. It is wise to leave one’s pride at home because it will likely take a beating. Even while in English-speaking Australia we experienced a real faux pas. We had been given a list of common USA words that had very different meanings there. For example, we were told not to say “bloody” for obvious reasons or say “I’m stuffed” because that means pregnant.

Do you speak my language?

Of course it is not possible to cover every potential situation. During a high school assembly our mission’s group was asked what basketball team we liked. Innocently my husband said, “We ‘root’ for the Bulls.” A collective gasp of disbelief rose from the crowd, followed by hilarious laughter. We, a church group, had just used the equivalent of our most vulgar word.

Learning the language is crucial for modern missions. Often the first year or more is primarily focused on learning the language. Many missionaries tell embarrassingly funny stories about misusing words. But not all situations are funny. One woman shared this experience.

At first both the teacher and students made fun of her slow reading, awful pronunciations and elementary questions. However her desire to learn the language for the sake of sharing Christ helped her press on through the embarrassment, bordering on humiliation. Eventually her courage to ask questions encouraged the other students to ask their own questions and the teacher gained a new respect for her.

Do you know my cultural taboos?

Embarrassment can come from more than language differences. While walking on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem Jim was holding my hand partly because I had vertigo from a flu bug. Other couples were holding hands or had an arm around a shoulder. Two men standing outside the Dome of the Rock mosque started waving their arms and saying something in Arabic.

Someone quickly relayed to us that there was no holding hands or any male-female contact on the Temple Mount whether the couple was married or not. We certainly did not want to start an international incident by holding hands! Being scolded for inappropriate pda (public display of affection) was both embarrassing and humorous. It brought back memories of our college days!!

On the last day of our tour a small-framed, ten-year old in our group forgot the rule about having knees and shoulders covered before going into the holy sites. Fortunately her father had an extra pair of extra-large pants in his back pack and another woman had a shawl. She was quite a sight, but it was most impressive to see how poised she was wearing her not-so-stylish-outfit.

Humility cures humiliation

Many others would have been awkward and devastated with humiliation. Often the difference between an embarrassing situations and a humiliating situation is how the “victim” responds. An embarrassing situation can easily become humiliation if the person over-reacts, lashes out, withdraws or broods over the incident. Others have already forgotten it, but the one who was embarrassed carries the experience until it becomes like a millstone tied around the neck.

One of my most embarrassing and close to humiliating experiences happened when I was being baptized in the Jordan River. The one thing I had looked forward to so much since knowing we were going to Israel became a less than positive memory.

While in elementary school I had been sprinkle baptized. However after explaining the meaningful symbolism (being dead to sin and rising to new life) of immersion to many over sixteen years of pastoring, a desire to be immersed grew. The Jordan River was the only place I would consider, if I ever got to Israel.

Some doubts were raised upon realizing that the baptismal place pretty commercialized and was not even where Jesus was baptized. But I still signed up. When we were told that couples would be baptized together at the same time, I asked Jim if he would be willing to be baptized with me as a symbol of our rededication to God, to each other and to the ministry.

Yardenit along the Jordan River is in the baptismal business. In the large souvenir shop a person can rent a towel and white robe to receive a certificate of baptism or rededication for $6. Along the river several sections are divided off with concrete walls for privacy. A few rows of bleachers are in each section for spectators.

Perhaps a sign of things to come was when I started off in the wrong section. Without my glasses on, it took a while to realize I didn’t recognize anyone. Our group was a couple sections further down. At the service something happened to me that brought the same stunned, silence (but with no laughter) as the Australia incident. (Don’t let your imaginations wander too far!!)

At supper that night a very kind man expressed concern, “I hope it was still a meaningful experience.” He didn’t want my embarrassment/humiliation to negate the purpose and meaning of baptism. I responded, “My pride was washed away and that is a good thing.” From then on it was a thing of the past and interactions with other people continued normally.

Embarrassment often comes when we expect to be perfect and worry what others will think of us when we fail. A popular saying puts this in perspective, “We wouldn’t worry so much about what people think of us, if we knew just how seldom they really think of us!” Romans 12:3 reminds us, “Do not think of yourself more highly than you ought, but rather think of yourself with sober judgment in accordance with the measure of faith God has given you.”

In this Thursday phase of life (past middle age) I am finally learning to let go of embarrassment. Life comes into perspective when I think of all the embarrassing and humiliating experiences of Jesus: letting go of the powers of deity; putting up with his own human limitations and that of others; facing rejection, denial and betrayal by friends; facing the humiliation of a false arrest, public flogging and degrading crucifixion by enemies. Jesus humbled himself by not being conscious of himself but focused on completing his ministry and mission.

If Jesus could humble himself and become obedient to death--even death on a cross (Philippians 2:8b), I can certainly strive to follow that example of humility rather than wallowing in embarrassment and humiliation.

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Surviving Survivor (September 15, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

Episode one of the controversial new season of Survivor: Cook Islands is history. While the controversy may not be over, the hype is now replaced with actual footage of actual people. Discussion can focus on the facts of the show with four teams divided along racial lines that will eventually merge, rather than judgments about the concept in general.

Does anyone else find it interesting that a core issue with racism or any "ism" is pre-judging based on assumptions without first hand knowledge? Hmmm?

NAACP withholds pre-judgment

Not everyone chose to prejudge the show. Producer Mark Burnett expressed appreciation to NAACP in an interview with The Slug, the asap blog, "Issues of race are very complex and emotional in this country. What I've done, I've brought this to the forefront. And I applaud the NAACP for saying they're gonna reserve judgment until they see the series. They don't necessarily like the idea, but they're gonna reserve judgment. That's the right approach. Anybody should watch a few episodes first."

In no way would I want to minimize the ongoing reality of racism or negate the tragedies inflicted by one race upon another. Racism is still alive and well as noted in "Thursday Thoughts" two weeks ago. The public outcry about the show is proof of that. Upon learning of the racial teams the night before filming started, one of the cast members echoed the major concern that the show would reinforce stereotypes and intensify racial prejudice.

One show is certainly not enough to know how the racial issue will ultimately play out, but at this point it can be noted that each team was given the same starting point and instructions, given the same opportunity for supplies and assigned the same tasks. No advantage or disadvantage was given to any team. So far the majority of the action has shown issues and tensions within a group rather than any conflict or comparison between groups.

Any reality show is still a show

Concerning all the hype, one frustrated observer gave everyone a reality check, "Get over it already. It is a TV show!"

Does anyone else find it interesting that the same people who normally downplay the cultural influence of TV violence, sexual immorality and vulgar language are some of the same people who are so confident that this one show is going to start race riots and set us back decades in racial equality? Hmmm?

"The idea for this actually came from the criticism that 'Survivor' was not ethnically diverse enough, because for whatever reason, we always have a low number of minority applicants apply for the show," show host Jeff Probst explained. The original goal was simply to have as racially diverse a show as possible. When the group got together it became obvious that cultural identity was very important.

Burnett, who came up with the idea said, "In my heart of hearts I believe people judge others by their ability and interactions with others not by the color of skin. If people get to know each other, it (destroys) hate." Perhaps he is a bit idealistic, but knowledge does go a long way in breaking down misconceptions. The US military and relief organizations do this every day in trying to bring aid and knowledge to people who through prejudice hate all Americans.

Remember, whatever is seen on TV is just a fraction of what is filmed. There is a ton more film on the floor of the editing room than is shown. Knowing the racial sensitivities, you can be sure most, if not all, overtly racial comments were edited. In fact the public was assured that any overt racist was cut during casting. Now there is a discrimination suit waiting to happen!

Race (or any one trait) does not define a person

The cast responses that were actually aired were very interesting. Was it a racist statement when one wondered if it was "kosher" to divide by race? A sense of feeling responsible to represent their specific community well was raised. But that is not new for "Survivor." Any person who has been identified with a specific sub-group carried that burden. For example one gay person expressed a desire to show that gay men could be athletic.

Christians on the show have come in all varieties from the "let's pray out loud about everything" to the "let's invoke God's name, but act like the devil" to "let's genuinely care for others and play as ethically as possible." As a Christian there have been many times when I wished they had kept their religion to themselves. They reinforced negative stereotypes.

A couple cast members summed up the racial issue this way. "Surviving out here is not a matter of race, it is a human effort." Another understands the game well, "I don't really care how you divide it because I know that I need a certain amount of people to be on my side to help me get through this." Ultimately, to win this game, you're voting people out that are then on the jury that have to come back and vote for you. So, the person who wins is actually going to do the best job of merging with all different ethnicities."

What was most interesting was the concerns people had for being in a group exclusively of their race. One noted that being so alike would cause friction. Another observed that all of them were head strong and did not like to be told what to do. A very revealing comment put race in perspective, "I have never fit with (my race)." The Latino and Asian groups actually have a variety of sub-cultures within them. Being of the same race does not mean automatic cohesiveness.

If you choose to continue watching keep you eye open for these other traits that can and will divide: male vs. female, blue-collar vs. white-collar, younger vs. older, leader vs. follower, and lazy vs. industrious. Ultimately any group rises and falls on the kind (not race) of people involved, their personalities and how well they choose to work together.

Along the way we may learn some cultural things such as what to do with "bad wind" which has nothing to do with digestive problems!

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Visit my husband's site for his thoughts at www.jameswatkins.com

This far and no farther (September 7, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

Setting boundaries is crucial for civilization. While in Israel we had quite a lesson on boundaries and we have all seen the devastation that occurs when boundaries are violated. In the United States, we are used to personal property boundaries being marked by a line fence. Our state boundaries are marked by signs, “Welcome to Indiana” or “You are leaving Indiana, come again soon.” Even the boundaries into Canada and Mexico are simply checkpoints, although a physical wall is rising along the Mexico border.

Not so in Israel where the borders are marked by “no-man's-land” areas of varying widths. Near Metula along the northern Israeli border with Syria and Lebanon we looked over a peaceful valley, which serves as the no-man's-land. Between the nations was a United Nations peacekeeper's settlement. On Israel's side high up on a mountain were numerous surveillance satellite dishes. We were sternly warned not to take any pictures of the intelligence gathering equipment.

Riding back south along the eastern side of the Sea of Galilee we had a lofty view of the natural no-man's-land between the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and Israel. The Great Rift Valley through which the Jordan River runs provides a wide physical barrier. When we actually crossed the border from Israel into Jordan, it was an over two hour ordeal. Our bus was actually the first in line, so no doubt the process took much longer for later buses.

Our first sight at the border checkpoint was what we assumed to be an undercover military person, dressed in civilian clothes, carrying a M-16 rifle. As law-abiding tourists that was both unsettling and reassuring. If he had worn a uniform, we would have at least known he was official without having to assume. Our bus driver was questioned at length then a uniformed official boarded the bus to check all of our passports. We got off the Israeli bus to get processed out of Israel by getting our passports stamped.

We got onto a packed shuttle bus with a mixture of national people and tourists, which took us through the no-man's-land to the Jordanian checkpoint. Once again passports were checked and stamped to get processed into Jordan. We then had our luggage electronically scanned and walked across the parking lot to our Jordanian bus and driver. The only hint of fear was leaving our passport with the Jordanian officials as we headed for the bus. One thing that is drilled into international travelers is to never let your passport out of your sight or out of your possession. We were assured they would all be delivered back to us once we were on the bus and they were.

Each of the natural boundaries noted above have limits as to who can cross the border and what is required to cross the border. We could only look over into Syria and Lebanon, but not enter because we did not have the required paperwork and prior authorization. We could enter Jordan through a detailed process because the travel agency had received prior clearance and we had the proper paperwork. We were careful to follow our guide's instructions to the letter. We did not try to go cross-country through no-man's-land in the Great Rift Valley. We only crossed at the specified location.

After lunch we visited the church on Mt. Nebo, which became a boundary for Moses. It was here that he looked over into the Promised Land of Canaan (now Israel). On very clear days the naked eye can pick out Bethlehem, the towers and buildings of Jerusalem from the Mount of Olives all the way to Ramallah, as well as the Jordan Valley, the Dead Sea and Jericho. Over three thousand years has not been kind to the area as it did not look much like a land flowing with milk and honey.

Yet, after delivering God's people from Egypt and wandering in the wilderness for forty years with a motley crew who were “rebellious and stiff- necked” (Moses' description--Deuteronomy 31:27), it was no doubt a site for sore eyes--and feet. Yet reaching this great accomplishment was to become his moment of “this far and no farther.” Deuteronomy 32:49-52 gives the reason. "Go up into the Abarim Range to Mount Nebo in Moab, across from Jericho, and view Canaan, the land I am giving the Israelites as their own possession. There on the mountain that you have climbed you will die and be gathered to your people, just as your brother Aaron died on Mount Hor and was gathered to his people. This is because both of you broke faith with me in the presence of the Israelites at the waters of Meribah Kadesh in the Desert of Zin and because you did not uphold my holiness among the Israelites. Therefore, you will see the land only from a distance; you will not enter the land I am giving to the people of Israel." The boundary Moses faced was one of his own making. His behavior of disobedience placed limits on his future. With no added commentary let me simply make a few observations about Moses that can serve as lessons for us in the twenty-first century:

1. Spiritual boundaries require such things as keeping faith with God and upholding (honoring) God's holiness.

2. Violating spiritual boundaries has serious consequences.

3. Even God-chosen leaders can falter and fail to perfectly live within God's established boundaries.

4. God still chooses to use flawed leaders to accomplish the ultimate purposes (in this case getting the children of Israel to the Promised Land).

5. Every leader, whether famous or infamous, has a “this far and no farther” moment at which time a transition must be made to new leadership.

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Red and yellow, black and white (August 31, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

Racism is alive and well. Remembering the tragic losses of Hurricane Katrina has raised the issues of race. The complexion of New Orleans had become lighter due in part to greater wealth and access to resources for the Caucasian race. However the percentage of African-Americans is growing again, which is raising some old tensions and causing race relations to be worse than any time in the past forty years.

A news piece on Houston's increase of crime and unemployment pointed to the influx of hurricane victims, whose welcome is fast wearing thin. In an attempt to help Katrina victims last year, an Arian Nation group sent a vast amount of aid. Only one string was attached. Their goods could only go to help Arian people. The boxes are stored, left unopened.

A rising danger is found in hate-filled neo-Nazi groups that are gaining in popularity through rallies, publications and Olsen twin look-alikes Lynx and Lamb Gaede. These cute blue-eyed, teenage blondes make recordings under the name of 'Prussian Blue' highlighting both their heritage and blue eyes. Wearing smiley face t-shirts with Adolph Hitler's trademark hair and moustache, their music pays tributes to the German dictator and the superiority of the white race.

Add to the mix the political firestorm over immigration on both sides of the border and the suspicions cast on all Arabs. Iraq may not be the only place a civil war is brewing.

Christianity should be but is not always a force against racism. One church in the mid-seventies had an opportunity to bus a group of from an orphanage to the services. The women's missionary society president said, "We can bring the white kids here, but the black kids will ruin our new paneling. Many church people refuse to give funds to missions saying, "Why should we help people over there, when there is so much need here in the United States?" Perhaps that would be a valid, though still a poor point, if they actually gave funds to help the great needs here.

In my day we learned the children's chorus "Jesus loves the little children, all the children of the world; red and yellow, black and white they are precious in His sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world." Unfortunately, too often the song was limited to a mission's song. Of course Jesus loved them. Of course we would love them as long as they remained children and were not in our neighborhood or country.

Wake-up call to Christ's followers

God's multi-national intent is clear from God's first promise to Abraham, ". . . all peoples on earth will be blessed through you" (Genesis 12:3); to Isaiah's prophecy, ". . . for my house will be called a house of prayer for all nations" (56:7); to the announcement of Jesus' birth to the shepherds, "I bring you good news, of great joy that will be for all the people" (Luke 2:10); to Peter's inclusive proclamation of Gentiles, "I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right" (Acts 10:34); to of the multitudes before God's throne, ". . . every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. . . . They cried out in a loud voice "Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne and to the Lamb'" (Revelation 7:9-10).

Do we forget that on the day of Pentecost the good news was proclaimed to a multi-national audience each in their own language? Do we forget that the gospel is most powerful when it is embodied in human skin? Do we forget that even sending written material or speaking over the radio waves requires first knowing and translating the language, which requires intermingling with those who speak the language.

Evidence that Christian believers have been known to "get it" is demonstrated on the walls of The Church of the Annunciation in Nazareth. An impressive art gallery is formed on the walls with the artwork of numerous nations depicting the annunciation, the Madonna and Child or other scenes in the life of Jesus. Interestingly whatever nationality donated the piece, the artwork reflects that culture; Asian countries depict an Asian Mary and Jesus; African countries depict an African Mary and Jesus; European countries depict a European Mary and Jesus; Hispanic countries depict a Hispanic Mary and Jesus.

At first I was disappointed with the United States donation. It is a huge, 3-D metallic-looking figure. Gaudy was the first word that came to mind. However in light of the multi-national mix of the United States, perhaps it was an attempt to by-pass nationality and depict the glorious splendor of the event. Perhaps I am stretching the point and imposing unintended meaning to the artist's work.

Racism must stop in heart, mind and practive

Stopping racism will take three practical steps. First the issue must be addressed in the heart. Scriptures that plainly speak to God's plan for a multi-cultural people (Church) must be taken seriously. Repentance for selfishly withholding the Good News of Jesus Christ is in order. When we see a person of a different skin tone or ethnic background do we envision a Christian brother or sister? Or do we immediately judge them as other-than Christian?

Our heart is a first step, but the mind must also be engaged. Often ignorance is the breeding ground for prejudice. Our perceptions from years of upbringing or hearing only negative experiences or seeing threats to our position of preference and privilege make thinking about racial issues a challenge. Often barriers exist because there has been limited or no personal experience. Short-term intercultural experiences whether outside or inside the United States can be revolutionary to our thinking and hopefully to our actions.

The proof of a person's heart and mind transformation is in the practice. Living in an area of little diversity and having no means to travel are not excuses. An easy way to begin reshaping our thinking is to read. Historical works about other cultures whether fiction and nonfiction help us get into another person's skin and mind. Common human feelings and struggles are brought to the surface. When we are in situations where there are other races present, make it a point to smile, or make over a baby or start a casual conversation. If we live in a culturally diverse area, seek out ways to become involved with churches and organizations seeking to understand and help build positive race relations. Where can we work side by side with people of all races? What do we say not only to their face, but also about them to our closest friends?

Are we as believers in Jesus a part of the problem or part of the solution? When we pray, "Your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven" do we realize that God's kingdom is multi-cultural, yet united in faith? I want to highlight the work of my friends, Adam and Christy Lipscomb who are planting a church in the inner city of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Their goal is to develop a truly multi-cultural church which accurately reflects their location. They live in the inner city and use a variety of creative outreach methods. One is offering citizenship classes which have people form seven different nationalities attending. Although they have faced many challenges in the past two years, including a house break-in, they are having a Raise the Praise Celebration September 24 at 7 pm in their new church building.

Here are a few of their prayer concerns: "Pray for me (Christy) as I seek a relationship with a "spiritualistic" woman who is in a lot of pain. Pray for Terri as she begins a mentoring relationship with a new Bosnian Christian. Pray for Don, a young Christian, as he witnesses as work. Pray for Robert as he invites his neighbors to church and cares for their daily needs. Pray for Martin as he does street evangelism. Pray for Dawn as she builds relationships at work with people in the occult. Pray for Reamy as he invites students in the Citizenship class to church. Pray for Adam as he builds a relationship with a young couple. …And for the many others seeking to witness to Jesus' transformation in their lives!"

Comments

"Amen to your Rush to Judgment article. Explained very well." NW

Related site

To read my husband's "Top ten signs your church may be prejudice" click here

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Rush to judgment (August 24, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

The early morning tragic murder of JonBenet Ramsey on December 26, 1996 led the Boulder, Colorado detectives to make a rush to judgment. Almost immediately one or both parents were singled out as prime suspects and even the older brother was a suspect for a while. Not until March 31, 2003, did a judge determine there was not enough evidence to indict any of them. Plus evidence indicated an outside intruder committed the act. Still nearly 50 percent of those surveyed still believed one or both were guilty of killing their daughter. Two months ago today Mrs. Ramsey died of ovarian cancer with a cloud remaining over her head in the eyes of many.

The case went virtually cold until last week's bombshell pseudo-confession by John Mark Karr that he was with JonBenet when she died. Too many uncertainties loom large to make a rush to judgment this time. Whether John Mark is a murderer or an obsessed pedophile will be played out in the media for all to see. However it turns out, a family has been destroyed both by the death of a daughter and sister, as well as the character assassination.

Rushing to judgment

Rushing to judgment is a common human behavior. Consider how often “perceiving is believing” (last week's column). People tend to reinforce their perceptions by only seeing what supports their belief. Any contrary evidence is disregarded or explained in light of the established belief. Dogmatic beliefs are perpetuated based on false information and assumptions or at best incomplete true information.

When we visited the city of Nazareth, I couldn't help but think of the number of times the people rushed to judgment in that biblical city. First, consider the effect of the annunciation. Today a beautiful church covers a cave-like entrance believed to be the home of Mary where the angel announced that she would give birth to a son and call him Jesus. Across a courtyard is St. Joseph's Church which has excavated a cave believed to be Joseph's workshop. Both beautiful sites belie the real first century drama.

Initially, only Mary had the inside scoop about this upcoming birth. Although she did not understand it, she was willing to surrender to God's plan (Luke 1:26-38). As honorable and exemplary as that is, what about Joseph? Joseph's first response was to rush to judgment, assuming Mary had been unfaithful. If that was Joseph's response before an angel appeared to him in a dream to explain the situation (Matthew 1:18-25), what would Mary and Joseph's parents think? No doubt a few of the neighbors had more than a little to say about this scandal in Nazareth, “Tssk, tssk! Who would have thought that could happen with such a godly couple? Of course they deny it, but we all know better.”

Many believe Mary went to visit her relative, Elizabeth partially to escape the public humiliation of the growing situation (Luke 1:39-45). In addition, Elizabeth of all people would understand God's involvement in unconventional pregnancies (Luke 1:5-25). Finding people who can both relate to our difficult circumstances and withhold judgment are a rare gift in time of need. Difficult circumstances may be due to events beyond our control, or due to our wrong choices, whether deliberate or unintentional. In either case, a safe refuge is welcome.

Jesus grew up in Nazareth, which did not have a very good reputation. Nathaniel questioned Philip as to whether anything good could come from there (John 1:46). It is unstated as to what prompted that belief. It seems others had rushed to judgment concerning the entire town.

After successfully passing the various temptations, Jesus began his ministry by teaching in the synagogues. However, his hometown reception was not very successful (Luke 4:16-30). As was his custom he went to his hometown synagogue in Nazareth (we visited the site). When he read the passage from Isaiah 61:1-2 and declared that this scripture was fulfilled in their hearing, their response was to rush to judgment, “Isn't this Joseph's son?”

What is so unusual about that question? It seems pretty normal for a group of older men who knew you as a child to say things like, “Who do you think you are? We've known you all your life and you are nothing so special. How dare you apply this Messianic scripture to yourself! What delusions of grandeur are you suffering from to make such an outrageous statement?”

Could it be that even today people find it hard to see the hand of God at work in those who are closest to them; those home grown young men and women? Is it too easy to keep them in their place, rather than rejoicing with them? Short of claiming to be the Messiah, can we affirm another's vision and passion without raining down negative judgment?

Evidently, Jesus had not read Dale Carnegie's book How to Win Friends and Influence People. He was untactful in his honesty. Not only was he claiming to fulfill the Messianic role, but pointed out examples of times when the Israelites were overlooked to receive miracles in favor of Gentiles who believed. Not much could raise the fury of Israelites more than having Gentiles put in a more favorable light than they.

Not only was there a rush to judgment, but a rush to the door. The furious crowd chased Jesus out of town intending to throw him off a cliff. (The terrain around Nazareth is very hilly, so it is easy to envision this scene.) Outside of the miracle which allowed him to walk right through the crowd unharmed, the ministry of Jesus could have ended the day it began.

Reserving judgment

A wiser approach would have been to take a more “wait and see” view. When the Sanhedrin wanted to kill the apostles for continuing to teach in the name of Jesus, a wise Gamaliel advised to let them go and see what would become of this new religion. “For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail. But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God” (Acts 5:25-42).

What is there in us that wants to rush to judgment and be both judge and jury? Why is it so difficult to admit that there are things that do not make sense to us, but that does not make them wrong or false? What makes us assume we know the ins and outs of a situation without going to the sources? What makes us so impatient to judge a situation as right or wrong instead of waiting to see the results? Have we ever fought against God when we had to have the first and last word?

When will we realize that there are always at least two sides to every story? The saying goes, “On every topic, there are three opinions--yours, mine and the right one.” Perhaps combining yours and mine would get us closer to a fuller understanding of the right one.

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Do you see what I see? (August 17, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

Point of Clarification/Correction from last week's Thursday Thought: While sharing how impressed I was with the excavations at Capernaum, I made some concluding remarks that could easily be misunderstood. It began with the statement, “More important than whether the house of Peter is real, are the real Teacher and teachings.” However, I went on to say, “Even more important than the reality of the Teacher and teachings of the first century, is what we in the twenty-first century do with Him. “

What we do with Jesus is NOT more important than the reality of the Teacher and teachings. Far too many people hold to the view that what we believe is not as important as the fact that we sincerely believe. We all know that sincerely believing we are not bound by gravity will not spare us the fate of being splattered on the sidewalk if we jump off a tall building.

Having our beliefs solidly grounded on the Savior, Jesus Christ, God's son and the biblical teachings are critical. IN ADDITION, how our faith in Christ is lived out in the twenty-first century is vitally important (but not more important).

As we toured Israel we heard over and over, “This is believed to be the place where. . . “ Some events even have more than one possible site identified. I must admit it was easier for me to see biblical events at more natural places such as the Sea of Galilee, shepherds cave and the garden tomb. While some may be deeply blessed by the beautiful churches that mark so many sacred spots, it did not make it easier for me to envision the biblical accounts. However, as believers in Jesus, we know that seeing is not the basis for believing. After the disciple, Thomas saw the hands of Jesus, he believed. Jesus responded, “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe” (John 20:24-29).

Perceiving is believing

It really is a good thing that we live by faith and not by sight. Skeptical unbelievers often cling to the saying--seeing is believing and refuse to believe anything they cannot see, hear, smell, taste or touch. I am pretty sure they believe in gravity, wind, electricity, sound waves, etc. Followers of Jesus are viewed as weak people relying on an unseen crutch.

But even sight can be a very deceptive thing. What we see is only the beginning of the process. What we see goes through an elaborate process, which includes filtering information and assigning meaning that fits our beliefs, past experiences or expectations. Ten people can see the same accident and there will be ten variations on the eye-witness reports. Even the four writers of the Gospels focused on different aspects, included different stories and addressed different audiences.

Do you see what I see?

General Psychology books often show ambiguous line figures, such as stairs or a slinky-type coil, which can be seen in more than one way. Optical illusions, depth perception and misdirection can drive us crazy. But they do point out how two sincere people can sincerely see two different things. Edgar Rubin used a line drawing which can be seen as a goblet or two faces looking at each other depending on the focus.

Another example of this principle is looking at a portrait of a woman. Some see an old wrinkled face with a huge nose. Others see a beautiful young woman. How can that be? I do not pretend to understand completely, but a lot has to do with the focal point and how the other parts fit in relation to it. At first all I could see was the old woman. (Some say that is a sign of being a pessimist). After someone pointed out what direction the young woman was facing, my focus changed. Seeing the young woman did not make the old woman any less real, but now I could see one and then the other. Sometimes I see both at the same time. Now what does that say?

We enjoy watching criminal who-dunnit shows. Evidence is everything. But reality can defy evidence at times or evidence can be only part of the story. In one episode three investigators focused on three different aspects of the crime. Each collected evidence and proposed a crime scenario. Each one came to a different conclusion and suspect by focusing on incomplete information. Finally they shared their perceptions, often with great disdain for the others' findings. While each one clung to his or her evidence, a fourth investigator saw the thread that tied the other pieces of evidence together and the crime was solved.

Myoptic thinking in hazardous to your health

Two people seeing the same thing does not mean there will be an agreement in beliefs as to what happened or what it means. When conflicts arise, it is too easy to believe our perception is the only reality and define any other explanation as a lie or the other person as a liar. Daily we see both conservative and liberal news reporters skewing events through their respective lenses. On capital hill it is called political grid-lock with each side dug into certain a perspective and bent on discrediting all others.

The same can be said for preachers and theologians, who pick a scripture, bolster it with other scriptures and dig their heels in to discredit all others. We can become so dogmatic that we fail to see even a grain of truth in a different perspective. Unfortunately, the perspective is not all that is blasted. The person becomes the target.

On a personal level, we tend to form an opinion, whether positive or negative, of a person or situation. No matter what else happens, we filter the words and behaviors of that person through that lens and call it truth. Unless there is a genuine admission that there may be more to the story or at least a different perspective, the danger of verbal or literal feuds exist.

Do I see what you see?

Two sisters both needed an orange, but there was just one orange. Many solutions were generated. The oldest could take it because it was her right. The youngest could take it because she was spoiled. They could barter for it and whoever was willing to give up the most valuable possession or offer the most work in exchange would get it. They could cut it in half. Eventually the sisters actually discussed their individual need for an orange. One wanted it for juice and the other wanted the peeling for fruit cake. Seeing it from each other's perspective allowed each sister to have all of the orange she needed. Most importantly the relationship stayed intact.

Seeing what the other person sees requires genuine communication and an openness to admit that none of us has the total picture. At my high school graduation I presented a memorized declaration called, “I might be wrong. You might be right.” At times those words can be harder to say than, “I am sorry. Please forgive me.”

Trying to looking at a different view does not negate what you perceive, but it can broaden it, perhaps even correct it, if needed. While there are some non-negotiable items in scripture, there are probably a whole lot less than we want to admit. Often our perceived differences are much fewer than we first believe. The challenge is being willing to work toward unity where possible and work toward charity where unity is not possible.

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Is it real? (August 10, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

Archaeology fascinates me. After the pain-staking work of unearthing objects, comes the task of determining if items are real. Carbon dating, style of pottery, type of inscriptions and comparison with similar objects and ancient writings are a few methods used. In writing the book, Recovering Capharnaum, Stanislao Loffreda reminds us, “The archaeologist, as M. Wheeler used to say, is digging up not things, but people.” His final goal is to meet past generations, to speak with them and let them speak to present generations.

History and Excavation of Capernaum

After eating lunch at Peter's Restaurant, where we declined the whole fish with tail, head and eyes in preference for the fish and chicken kabobs, we visited the amazing ruins of Capharnaum (spelled Capernaum in the Bible and presently known as Kefer Nahum in Hebrew). After the city was abandoned over a thousand years ago, early visits there by E. Robinson in 1838 and C. W. Wilson in 1866 found a desolate place with a few Arabs living among the ruins. In 1894 the Franciscan Custody of the Holy Land acquired two-thirds of the property from Bedouins and fenced it off for protection. Minor excavations were conducted in the early 1900's. From 1968 to 1991 Fr. Virgilio C. Corbo and Loffreda worked almost uninterrupted resulting in what we saw.

In various layers remains date back to 2000 BCE, but of most interest to Christians are the findings around the first century. Based on various remains and writings it is obvious the inhabitants during the first to fourth century were Jewish with a growing number of Minim (Jewish Christians). Between the fifth and seventh century it is evident that Gentile Christians were predominant and then by the seventh century many homes public buildings were abandoned during the Arab/Moslem period.

Homes there had many roofed rooms (no roofs survive today) around a common courtyard, which was entered from the common street through a single doorway. Most were shared by two or more extended family units. Most daily activity occurred in the courtyard, even sleeping under the stars in fair weather. The rooms were for storing items and sleeping during the rainy season. Various horizontal layers are made up of beaten earth mixed with such things as jars, cooking pots, bowls and small palm-size Herodian lamps, which date to the second half of the first century.

Peter's first century house?

It was amazing to walk on well laid out streets and alleys with two-three foot high walls revealing an extensive footprint of an ancient town estimated to have been up to 1,500 people. In addition to the synagogue, many shops and homes, the main point of interest for us was St. Peter's home. But is it really his house? How can people say that with certainty? That is task of the archaeologist.

So what makes Capernaum so fascinating and did Peter live in the house that is singled out. Five out the twelve disciples are mentioned living there: Simon Peter and his brother Andrew, the sons of Zebedee, James and John, plus Levi the tax collector (Matthew 4:18-22 and Mark 2:13-17). Matthew 4:12-17 mentions that after John the Baptist was imprisoned, Jesus left Nazareth and lived in Capernaum both to fulfill prophecy and to preach repentance in an well-traveled area on the Damascus Highway. Also it was away from the scrutiny of the Roman political powers at Tiberias (other side of the Sea of Galilee). This became his own town (Matthew 9:1), people tried to keep him from leaving (Luke 4:42-44), people tried to find him there (John 6:24).

People wanted Jesus to stay there because of the many miracles he performed. Capernaum witnessed so many miracles that Jesus said Sodom would have even been converted if they same things had happened there (Matthew 11:23). Miracles included the cleansing of the demon-possessed man in the synagogue (Mark 1:21-28), healing Peter's mother-in-law (Mark 1:29-31) healing many sick and demon-possessed (Mark 1:32-34), forgiveness and healing of the paralytic let down through the roof (Mark 2:1-12), healing the centurion's servant (Matthew 8:5-13) and healing the royal official's son (John 2:12).

It has been believed that Jesus lived in Peter's house while he preached in Galilee. The excavated house identified as Peter's is about 100 feet from the synagogue where Jesus taught. It is larger than many, which could house Peter's family, his brother, Andrew's family and his mother-in-law, as well as be the headquarters for Jesus ministry. Mark 1:33 mentions the whole town gathering at the door, which would be possible because the house is located on the main NS street with a large opening between the wide street and the doorway leading to the courtyard. The discussion related to paying taxes in Matthew 17:24-27 indicates that Jesus was a guest or living with Peter and thus considered a member of the family for tax purposes.

In addition to the physical properties, the traditional house of Peter was used for community/worship gatherings as early as the third quarter of the first century. Christian graffiti, monograms and symbols were found there in Greek, Paleo-Estrangelo, Aramaic and Latin. This indicates that the house was visited by both local worshipers and pilgrims from other lands. Fragments had sayings such as Jesus is called the Lord, Christ, the Most High, God, Amen, as well as graffiti with the name of Peter.

In the late 300's a wall was built around it to separate it from the rest of the town. In 380 a pilgrim named Egeria or Aetheria wrote an extensive travelogue in which she mentioned, “The house of the prince of the Apostles (St Peter) in Capharnaum was changed into a church; the walls, however, are still standing as they were.” In the mid-400's Gentile Christians placed an octagonal church within the wall and around the living quarters of the house. After the excavations, in 1990 an ultra-modern, elevated church was built over the ruins in such a way that we were able to see the old footprint of the octagonal church as well as the living quarters.

Is it real? Are we real?

So is this pile of rocks the real house of Peter? For me, these facts and many others too numerous to site indicate this was Peter's house where Jesus lived, taught and healed.

More important that whether the house of Peter is real, are the real Teacher and teachings. While in Capernaum Jesus offended the teachers of the law and Pharisees by speaking to the paralytic of forgiving his sin (Mark 2:1-12); he called a tax collector to follow him and ate at his house with other tax collectors, which shocked them and angered the religious establishment (Mark 2:13-17); he put a child in the center and taught his disciples about the last being first and children being welcome in the Kingdom (Mark 9:33-37) and last that Jesus gave a lengthy talk about being the bread of life and introduced the doctrine of eating his flesh and drinking his blood (John 6:24-59) remembered at the Last Supper.

Even more important than the reality of the Teacher and teachings of the first century, is what we in the twenty-first century do with Him. John 6:66 (is the reference significant?) records that after these hard teachings many of His disciples turned back and longer followed him. We must beware of following Jesus because of the archaeological “proof” of this or that site, or because of the blessings and miracles He performs even today or because of the easier teachings. Are we willing to follow Jesus when the teachings get hard; when they require mingling with sinners; when they require being last instead of first; when they require sacrifice of flesh and blood?

© 2006 Lois E. F. Watkins

Jeers and Cheers (August 3, 2006)
Lois E.F. Watkins, director

Some newspapers and magazines include a column such as “Jeers and Cheers” or “Orchids and Onions” highlighting the good and bad things people have done. Typically there are different people in each section. If truth be told, most all of us could fall in both categories from time to time; a cheer for this and a jeer for that.

For example, last week Peter was highlighted in his famous and infamous walk on the Sea of Galilee. He'd get a cheer for walking on water and a jeer for sinking. But that would not be his only example. Remember when he was applauded for declaring Jesus to be the Christ but then called the son of Satan for telling Jesus he would not die. Although Peter was honored with many special opportunities of being one of the inner three disciples, he was also greatly dishonored by blatantly denying Christ.

Peter's life story

The following list shows how often Peter's words and actions were onions rather than orchids. (Where stories are repeated in another gospel only the first reference is noted, so events are not in chronological order):

1. Called and listed first among Jesus' disciples (Matt. 4:18 and 10:2)
2. Walked on water (Matt. 14:25-28)
3. Sank in water (Matt. 14:29-30)
4. Jesus rebuked his doubt (Matt. 14:31)
5. Jesus called him “still so dull,” when he asked the meaning of a parable (Matt. 15:15-16)
6. Chosen with James and John to see the transfiguration (Matt. 16:1-3)
7. Blurted out his willingness to build three shelters there (Matt. 16:4)
8. Declared his unending loyalty even to the death (Matt. 26:33-35)
9. Chosen with James and John to go farther in Gethsemane (Matt. 26:37-46)
10. Followed Jesus at a distance into the courtyard of the high priest (Matt. 26:58)
11. Denied Christ three times (Matt. 26:69-75)
12. Mentioned individually by the angel t